Peter Thrower, PhD, Editor-in-Chief of International journal of the American Carbon Society, reveals the 8 top reasons so many manuscripts don’t make it to the peer review process. His thought can also be applied to other discipline. Here is the 'Eight reasons I rejected your article':
- It fails the technical screening.
- It does not fall within the Aims and Scope.
- It's incomplete.
- The procedures and/or analysis of the data is seen to be defective.
- The conclusions cannot be justified on the basis of the rest of the paper.
- It's is simply a small extension of a different paper, often from the same authors.
- It's incomprehensible.
- It's boring.